“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any from the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after some distance they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last noticed.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. In case the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 times to the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a effectively-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government organizations in regards to projects that could possibly pose a public risk. This case is additionally noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all upcoming public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, here the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is usually a right to life itself.
whether though granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
13. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is set up and also the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it is the prerogative on the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the varied penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is just not sufficient although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful way. Read more
This case is cited in numerous subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, plus the rule of legislation.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence and the separation of powers.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told with the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they had very little to fret about.